CRM-M-32059-2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.129 CRM-M-32059-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 11.06.2025 Neetu @ Neetu Rani and others ..... Petitioners VERSUS State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Mr. Manu Loona, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** KIRTI SINGH, J. (Oral) This petition under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS, 2023) has been filed seeking direction to the official respondents No.2 and 3 to not to harass the petitioners in connection with FIR No.57 dated 22.04.2025, under Sections 103, 351(2), 191(3) & 190 of BNS and Sections 25 & 27 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station City Fazilka, District Fazilka and to take action on their representation dated 02.06.2025 (Annexure P3). 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have filed a representation dated 02.06.2025 (Annexure P3) before respondent No.2 raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereupon. He further submits that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if, appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2, to consider and decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and to take necessary action thereupon. 3. Notice of motion. Ramandeep Singh 2025.06.11 13:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-32059-2025 (O&M) 2 4. Served with an advance copy of the petition, Mr. Adhiraj Singh, AAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent(s)-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners and without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the aforesaid representation dated 02.06.2025 (Annexure P3) of the petitioners expeditiously, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. 6. Needless to say, if any threat perception is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life and liberty. (KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE 11.06.2025 Ramandeep Singh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Ramandeep Singh 2025.06.11 13:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document