Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68982 (KAR)

SRI. DASAPPA v. SRI A.S.JAYASIMHA

RFA/477/2021 · 2025-08-07

S Rachaiah

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30687 RFA No. 477 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 477 OF 2021 (SP) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. DASAPPA DEAD BY LRS SRI RAMAKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, S/O SRI. DASAPPA. 2. SMT. RENUKA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS W/O SRI RAMAKRISHNAPPA.. 3. SRI. GOVINDA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O SRI DASAPPA. 4. SMT. LAKSHAMAMMA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, D/O SRI. DASAPPA. 5. SMT. KAMALAMMA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, D/O SRI DASAPPA. 6. SMT. PREMA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, D/O SRI DASAPPA. 7. SRI SHANKARA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, D/O SRI DASAPPA, Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30687 RFA No. 477 of 2021 ALL ARE RESIDENT OF O.C. CHOODANAHALLI VILLAGE, UDAYPURA POST UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH - 560 007 BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 560 064. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SUBRAHMANYA HEGDE., ADVOCATE FOR A2 TO A7) AND: 1. SRI. A.S.JAYASIMHA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O SRI A S PRAHALADA RAO, NO. 612, 2ND CROSS, 2ND BLOCK, 7TH BLOCK, BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU NOW R/AT NO. 352, 41ST CROSS, SRI RANGAVITTAIA NILAYA 8TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 082. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M S RAGHAVENDRA PRASAD., ADVOCATE) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.07.2009 PASSED IN OS.No.1847/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DVN), BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30687 RFA No. 477 of 2021 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Heard on I.A.No.1/2021 filed for seeking condonation of delay of 3812 days in preferring the appeal. 2. Perused the averments made in the affidavit accompanying application. Being not satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit, I.A.No.1/2021 is rejected. Consequently, the appeal stands dismissed. Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE JS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7