Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68977 (ALL)

NAUMAN v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/22409/2025 · 2025-08-13

Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:139445 Court No. - 87 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22409 of 2025 Applicant :- Nauman Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Singh Bais,Irfan Chaudhary,Srijan Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J. 1. Heard Shri Irfan Chaudhary, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. 2. The present bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in case crime No. 125 of 2025, under Section 8/21/29 of N.D.P.S. Act, police station Nakur, District Saharanpur, with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail. 3. It has been argued by learned counsel for applicant-accused that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the name of the applicant has transpired in the case on the confessional statement of co-accused Junaid, who has already been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 03.06.2025. It is further submitted that as per allegation in the first information report, recovery of 102 gram smack is said to have been made from possession of the co-accused Junaid, which is less than commercial quantity. He further contends that the applicant has criminal history of one more case, which has been duly explained. Lastly, it was submitted that the applicant is in judicial custody since 20.05.2025 and that in case applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail. 6. As per first information report, recovery of 102 gram smack is said to have been made from possession of the co-accused Junaid, which is less than commercial quantity. The name of the applicant has transpired in the case on the confessional statement of co- accused Junaid, who has already been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 03.06.2025. 7. Considering submissions of learned counsel for the parties, nature of accusations, period of detention and all attending facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits, a case for bail is made out. Accordingly the instant bail application is hereby allowed. 8. Let the applicant Nauman, involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned subject to the following conditions: (i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurize / intimidate the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted. (iv) The applicant shall not try to contact, threat or otherwise influence the informant or any of the witness of the case. 9. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the Court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel bail of applicant in accordance with law. Order Date :- 14.8.2025 RKM Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad