Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68973 (BOM)

Satyabhama Eknathrao Ambegave v. The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary Transport Department Mantralaya Mumbai

CP/618/2025 · 2025-12-09

Shri N B Suryawanshi, Vaishali Patil Jadhav

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

921 CONT. PETITION NO. 618 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 921 CONT. PETITION NO. 618 OF 2025 Satyabhama W/o. Eknathrao Ambegave VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary Transport Department Mantralaya Mumbai and Others … • Mr. R. V. Gunale, Advocate h/f. Mr. V. D. Gunale, Advocate for the Petitioner • Mr. A. V. Lavte, AGP for State • Mr. A. B. Dhongade, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 … CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI & VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 09.12.2025 P E R C O U R T : 1. Learned Advocate, Mr. Dhongade, on instructions from respondent Nos. 2 and 3, submits that order is partly complied with by permitting the petitioner to resume the duty. Now, only back wages remained to be paid and those will be paid within two weeks from today. 2. We record the said statement as an undertaking to this Court and dispose of the contempt petition. 3. If the back wages of the petitioner are not paid within four weeks from today, the same will be treated as aggravated form of contempt. [VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, J.] [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] komal kamble 1/1 2025:BHC-AUG:35321-DB