Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6897 (RAJ)

SAPNA W/O SHRI SATISH KUMAR, D/O SHRI HARISHCHANDRA B/C BRAHMIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/1188/2019 · 2025-08-14

Ashutosh Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:31886] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1188/2019 Sapna W/o Shri Satish Kumar, D/o Shri Harishchandra, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Adarsh Colony, Thana Kotwali, Tehsil Bharatpur, District Bharatpur, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP. 2. Satish Kumar S/o Shri Premchand, Aged About 46 Years, 3. Subhdra W/o Shri Premchand, Aged About 64 Years, 4. Naresh S/o Shri Premchand, Aged About 56 Years, All are R/o Katra Mohalla, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur, Raj. 5. Pista W/o Shri Rajendra, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Bhimnagar Bayana, Thana Bayana, District Bharatpur, Raj. 6. Manju W/o Shri Mahendra, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Tasai, Thana Kathoomer, District Alwar, Raj. 7. Beena W/o Shri Mohan Singh, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Pai Thana Jurhara, District Bharatpur, Raj. 8. Pushpa W/o Shri Pohapsingh, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Jurhara, Thana Jurhara, District Bharatpur, Raj. 9. Chanchal W/o Shri Satish Kumar, D/o Shri Hemraj, aged about 39 years, 10. Hemraj Sharma S/o Shri Gulabchand, Aged About 64 Years, 11. Uma Devi W/o Shri Hemraj Sharma, Aged About 59 Years, All are R/o 119/509, Thadi Market, Agarwal Farm, Mansarovar, Jaipur, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, Addl.G.A. Ms. Arti Sharma, Dy.G.A. [2025:RJ-JP:31886] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1188/2019] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 14/08/2025 1. Today, none appears on behalf of the petitioner even in second round. 2. It seems that the petitioner has lost his interest in the present petition. 3. In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. Stay application and all other pending applications also stand disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J TANISHA /9