NISHANT SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/17265/2025 · 2025-07-02
Sumeet Goel
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68958 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68958 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 108
CWP-17265-2025 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 2nd July, 2025
Nishant Singh and others
…. Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
…. Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL * * * Present : Mr.S.P.Arora, Advocate assisted by
Mr.Himanshu Arora, Advocate and
Ms.Iarisa Carmen Suting, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr.Sanjeev Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for the respondents.
* * * SHEEL NAGU, CJ. (Oral)
1. The present petition challenges notification dated 23.05.2025 (Annexure P-5), which is ‘Model Online Transfer Policy’ for the Government Employees of the State of Haryana.
2.
Learned counsel for the State, also representing respondent No.4, does not dispute that no notification has been issued by the State of Haryana in terms of Clause 2(iv) of the impugned notification (Annexure P-5) for applying the said Transfer Policy to the employees of the Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board (employer of the petitioners). Gianender Kumar 2025.07.03 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-17265-2025
-2-
3. In view of the above statement made by counsel for the respondents, no cause survives in this petition.
4. The petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
( SHEEL NAGU )
CHIEF JUSTICE
2nd July, 2025 ‘gian’ ( SUMEET GOEL ) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes No
Whether Reportable:
Yes
No Gianender Kumar 2025.07.03 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document