Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68953 (KAR)

MR VIDUR CHANDY v. MR TUSHAR GIRINATH

CCC/587/2023 · 2025-08-06

Anu Sivaraman, Rajesh Rai K

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30636-DB CCC No. 587 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 587 OF 2023 BETWEEN: MR. VIDUR CHANDY S/O MOHAN CHANDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1, HAYES ROAD "HAYES HALL" 2A, RICHMOND TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 025 …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. DEVARAJ K.S, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. TUSHAR GIRINATH COMMISSIONER, BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, BBMP HEAD OFFICE PREMISES, NR SQUARE, BENGALURU - 560 002 2. MR. SRINIVAS, REVENUE OFFICER, WARD NO.84, HAGADOORU, BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, WHITEFIELD SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU - 560 079 Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30636-DB CCC No. 587 of 2023 …ACCUSED (BY SMT RAMYA N HIRIYUR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. KARTHIKEYAN B.S, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2, VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 28.08.2023 A3 IS DELETED) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHERE IN HE PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE COURT BE PLEASED TO PROSECUTE AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 FOR WILFULLY DISOBEYING THE ORDER DATED 04.08.2021 (ANNEXURE A ) PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP.432/2021. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K) This contempt is initiated for the willful disobedience of the order dated 04.08.2021 passed in WP.No.432/2021 by the learned Single Judge of this Court, wherein the learned Single Judge has directed the BBMP to consider the representation given by the petitioner to rectify the extent of consolidated schedule A and B properties mentioned in the writ petition and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30636-DB CCC No. 587 of 2023 of three months from the date of receipt of copy of the said order. 2. Learned counsel appearing for respondents 1 and 2 filed compliance affidavit along with the endorsement dated 05.08.2025. 3. A perusal of the endorsement reveals that respondent No.2 has considered the representation of the petitioner as directed by the learned Single Judge. In that view of the matter, the contempt proceedings do not survive for further consideration. Accordingly, the contempt petition is closed. 4. If the complainant is aggrieved by the endorsement, he is at liberty to challenge the same. SD/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE PKS/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 65