CRWP-8481 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 240 GURMEET SINGH & ANR. STATE OF PUNJAB & CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. the Constitution of India the respondent No.3 126, 130 and 135 of 2. respondent No.3 to decide the application dated petitioner copy of order or gro against the petitioner 3. been contended by learned State Counsel that this petition has become 8481-2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH GURMEET SINGH & ANR. VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA P Mr. Gurnoor Singh Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Raghav Puggal, Advocate for respondent No.4. **** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. (Oral): This writ petition has been filed under the Constitution of India, for a prayer in the nature of mandamus respondent No.3 to act strictly in compliance with provisions of Sections 126, 130 and 135 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita It has also been requested that a direction be issued to the respondent No.3 to decide the application dated petitioners, whereby they had requested the respondent No.4 copy of order or ground on the basis of which he had initiated proceedings against the petitioners. With regard to abovementioned prayer at the very outset, it has been contended by learned State Counsel that this petition has become IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8481-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 19.05.2026 .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS .....RESPONDENT(S) SURYA PARTAP SINGH Advocate for Mr. Raghav Puggal, Advocate This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 a prayer in the nature of mandamus to direct strictly in compliance with provisions of Sections Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. also been requested that a direction be issued to the respondent No.3 to decide the application dated 31.07.2025 filed by the requested the respondent No.4 to provide a nd on the basis of which he had initiated proceedings With regard to abovementioned prayer at the very outset, it has been contended by learned State Counsel that this petition has become (O&M) 2026 (S) (S) 226 and 227 of direct strictly in compliance with provisions of Sections also been requested that a direction be issued to the filed by the to provide a nd on the basis of which he had initiated proceedings With regard to abovementioned prayer at the very outset, it has been contended by learned State Counsel that this petition has become VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.05.20 09:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8481 infructuous as the copies of abovementioned documents have been supplied. 4. contended by learned counsel for the petitioner been fabricated after the interim order dated 05.08.2025 passed by this Court, and that there are discrepancies in the abovementioned order. 5. observed that respondent No.3, the remedy available to and challenge the the copies abovementioned order become infructuous infructuous. 6. 19.05.2026 Vinod 8481-2025 (O&M) 2 infructuous as the copies of abovementioned documents have been supplied. In response to abovementioned arguments, it contended by learned counsel for the petitioner been fabricated after the interim order dated 05.08.2025 passed by this and that there are discrepancies in the abovementioned order. In view of abovementioned fact observed that if the petitioners are aggrieved of any order passed by the respondent No.3, the remedy available to and challenge the said order before the appropriate forum. However, o ies of documents have been supplied abovementioned order, it is hereby observed that the present petition has become infructuous. Thus the same is hereby infructuous. 2026 (SURYA PARTAP SINGH Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No infructuous as the copies of abovementioned documents have been supplied. In response to abovementioned arguments, it has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the documents have been fabricated after the interim order dated 05.08.2025 passed by this and that there are discrepancies in the abovementioned order. In view of abovementioned facts and circumstances, it is hereby aggrieved of any order passed by the respondent No.3, the remedy available to them is to file a revision petition order before the appropriate forum. However, o of documents have been supplied, irrespective of the legality of t is hereby observed that the present petition has is hereby dismissed as having rendered SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No infructuous as the copies of abovementioned documents have been supplied. has been that the documents have been fabricated after the interim order dated 05.08.2025 passed by this s and circumstances, it is hereby aggrieved of any order passed by the is to file a revision petition nce irrespective of the legality of t is hereby observed that the present petition has rendered VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.05.20 09:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document