Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68949 (PNJ)

SHADI LAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/6202/2025 · 2025-07-04

Sumeet Goel

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

115 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6202-2025 DATE OF DECISION: 04.07.2025 SHADI LAL AND ANOTHER .....PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: - Mr. H.S. Bedi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jatinder Pal Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab. Mr. Ayush Kaul, Advocate for respondent No.4. ….. SUMEET GOEL , J (ORAL) 1. The substantive prayer made in the petition reads as follows - “It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that the present petition may kindly be allowed and issue a writ order or directions especially in the nature of mandamus directing respondent no.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners endangered at the hands of respondent no.4 who have assaulted the petitioner and is threatening to eliminate the petitioner, whereas the police have taken no effective action despite representation dated 31.05.2025 (Annexure P- 6).” 2. The relevant part of the status report dated 30.06.2025 reads as under”- “That since 30.05.2025, Amish Tuli had returned to England and had not called up petitioners or any other family members and dispute inter-se parties relates to division/partition of property and since Amish Tuli/respondent No.4 had returned to England and no threat JATIN 2025.07.04 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6202-2025 -2- to life & liberty of petitioner could be found. However, petitioners had been provided with mobile numbers of SHO, Police Station Kalanaur & Control Room to contact said police officer in case any further need arises or when Amish Tuli returns back to India for any further assistance/help.” 3. In view of the above, no cause survives to keep the instant petition alive. 4. The same is accordingly dismissed. 5. Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to seek further remedy, as available in law, regarding any other grievances. (SUMEET GOEL) 04.07.2025 JUDGE Jatin Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JATIN 2025.07.04 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document