Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:111758 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22980 of 2025 Applicant :- Abu Ayub Alias Ayub Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Imran Ullah,Mohammad Daud Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Heard Sri Imran Ullah, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ramesh Kumar, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed to enlarge the applicant on bail in case crime No. 44 of 2025, u/s 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Puramufti, District Prayagraj. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that as per the F.I.R., the allegation is that the applicant along with co- accused committed forgery with the first informant by obtaining his thumb impression on a blank paper and manipulated the sale deed of the house of the informant. It is not in dispute that the sale deed is a registered sale deed which was duly executed before the Sub Registrar and the applicant has been falsely implicated. The dispute is purely civil in nature. It is further submitted that though the allegation is regarding incident of the month February, 2024, but the FIR was lodged in the year 2025 without giving any explanation. The applicant has explained his criminal history of two cases in the accompanying affidavit. He is languishing in jail since 21.3.2025. It is further submitted that charge sheet has been filed in the present case, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail, but he could not dispute the aforesaid fact. 5. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant- Abu Ayub @ Ayub, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 11.7.2025 Vandana Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad