HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 22453 of 2025 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Ms. Mansi Mishra, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present application has been filed by the applicants for quashing the entire proceeding of Case No. 15768 of 2025 (State Vs. Deepak and others), charge sheet dated 21.03.2025 arising out of Case Crime No. 18 of 2025, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Sikheda, District Muzaffarnagar as well as summoning/cognizance order dated 20.05.2025 pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 2, Muzaffarnagar in light of compromise dated 04.06.2025 made between the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the compromise has already been entered between the parties on 25.7.2025 and the same has been verified by the court concerned on 31.7.2025, therefore, the present case be finally decided. 4. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 has not disputed the facts as stated by learned counsel for the applicants. He further contended that opposite party no.2 does not want to proceed with the criminal case against the applicants and the same may be quashed. 5. Learned AGA does not dispute the fact that parties have entered into settlement which is duly verified by the court concerned. It is further submitted that he would have no objection in case criminal proceedings Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anchal, Pramod Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mansi Mishra Deepak Kumar And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) are put to an end. He further submits that in view of settlement there is virtually no chance of any conviction being recorded in the criminal proceedings. 6. Having examined the matter in its totality, this Court is of the view that the criminal proceedings in the present case had essentially been an outcome of a matrimonial dispute and there are no such over bearing circumstances for which the applicants ought to be prosecuted even after the parties has entered into a settlement. Needless to observe that with the present stand of the parties in terms of their settlement, there is practically no chance of recording conviction, even if the case under the F.I.R. in question is put to trial. In other words, entire exercise of trial would only be an exercise in futility. On the contrary, looking to the nature of dispute and the fact that the disputants have compromised and want to proceed peacefully ahead, it would be in the interest of justice that criminal proceedings in question are quashed. 7. It would be unfair or contrary to the interest of justice to continue with the criminal proceeding or continuation of the criminal proceeding would tantamount to abuse of process of law despite settlement and compromise between the victim and the wrongdoer and to secure the ends of justice, it is appropriate that the criminal case is put to an end. 8. In view of the fact that the parties do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them and the fact that matter has been mutually settled between the parties in view of the compromise dated 25.7.2025, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 9. Thus, in view of the well settled principles of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Parbatbhai Aahir Vs. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC 641, Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 and State of M.P. Vs. Laxmi Narayan, (2019) 5 SCC 688, the proceedings of the aforesaid case is hereby quashed. 10. The present application is, accordingly, allowed. September 1, 2025 VMA NA528 No. 22453 of 2025 2 (Vikram D. Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHWA MOHAN ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad