Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68939 (PNJ)

KARANDEEP SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRM-M/32073/2025 · 2025-06-16

Pankaj Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-32073-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 213 CRM-M-32073-2025 Date of decision : 16.06.2025 Karandeep Singh ...... Petitioner versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Aditi Girdhar, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Lovish Bansal, Advocate for the complainant. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.204 dated 15.04.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(3), 115, 118(2), 126, 324(4), 351(2) BNS (erstwhile 149, 148, 323, 326, 427, 506 IPC) at Police Station Assandh, District Karnal. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that dehors the allegations, the parties have settled their dispute entering into amicable settlement. Compromise deed dated 02.06.2025 has been placed on record as Annexure P-2. 3. The factum of there being a compromise between the parties is admitted by Mr. Lovish Bansal, Advocate who appears on behalf of the complainant and the injured-victim. DINESH KUMAR 2025.06.16 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-32073-2025 4. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the parties have already approached this Court seeking quashing of FIR on the basis of compromise. However, the petition could not be listed owing to partial working in the month of June, 2025. 5. Keeping in view the factum of there being compromise between the parties, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Ld. Trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned. 6. Needless to say nothing recorded herein shall be construed to be an expression of an opinion on the merits of the case. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 16.06.2025 Dinesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No DINESH KUMAR 2025.06.16 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document