2025:UHC:6154 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/880/2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Pankaj Joshi, learned Assistant Government Advocate, for the State. 3. Present applicant ‘Nargis @ Parveen, wife of Tasleem’ is praying for regular bail in relation to First Information Report dated 26.03.2025 bearing FIR No. 0086 of 2025, Police Station – Sitarganj, District – U.S. Nagar, wherein six persons have been implicated including the present applicant, mother-in-law and husband of the deceased for the offences punishable under Section 80 (2) and 85 of the BNS, 2023. 4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that present applicant is sister-in-law of the deceased and has no nexus with the dispute in between deceased and her husband. He further submits that during the investigation, three persons who were named in the FIR namely Babu, Rafiq and Akeel Ahmad were exonerated and charge sheet has been filed only against Taufeek Ahmad (husband), Amna Begam (mother-in-law of deceased) and present applicant - Nargis @ Gudiya (sister-in-law of the deceased). He further submits that husband and mother in law are in custody and present applicant is married and residing separately and now, charge sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant. 5. On the other side, learned State Counsel have not disputed this fact that charge-sheet has already been filed and as such, there is no 2025:UHC:6154 need of custodial interrogation of the applicant. 6. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that charge-sheet has already been filed and as such, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant, therefore, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves for bail. 7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant ‘Nargis @ Parveen, wife of Tasleem’ be released on bail on furnishing her personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 9. It is made clear that grant of bail to the present applicant this order shall not be treated as precedent in respect of other co- accused. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 15.07.2025. SKS