Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 859 of 2025 (S/S)
Smt. Deepa ….....Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
.….Respondents
Present:- Mr. Arun Pratap Shah, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Narain Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State.
Judgment
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Pursuant to a notification issued by the respondents for appointment to the vacant posts of Angan Bari Helpers in Anganwadi Centre Miyani, Village Miyani, Block Thatyur, Tehsil Nainbag, District Tehri Garhwal, the petitioner made online application. Subsequently, on the online portal, a list of candidates was declared, whose candidature was not considered on the ground of “incomplete documents”. It is the case of the petitioner that she has uploaded all the documents online and after uploading, the status was shown as submitted; it is wrong to say that the petitioner has not submitted the documents. Therefore, the petitioner seeks direction that her candidature may be considered for the position of Anganwadi Helper, with related reliefs.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3.
Learned State Counsel was required to get instructions. He would submit that the selection process for Anganwadi Sahayika is
2 still ongoing and as per the Government Order, the final selection list will be released only after the Appellate Authority resolves all the objections raised against the provisional selection. He would submit that, in fact, the objections of petitioner have already been received.
4.
The instructions as received by the learned State Counsel have been tendered for perusal of the Court. Let they be taken on record.
5.
Since, it is stated on behalf of the State that the objections of the petitioner are still under consideration, nothing survives in this petition. It may be disposed of with certain directions.
6.
The writ petition is disposed of with the directions to the respondent authorities to consider the objections of the petitioner, that have been filed by the petitioner, after affording her an opportunity of hearing.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
23.05.2025 Avneet/