SMT. RASHMI W/O LATE YOGENDRA KUMART v. THE COLLECTOR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
CW/2561/2025 · 2025-02-18
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6892 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6892 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:7080] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2561/2025 Smt. Rashmi W/o Late Yogendra Kumart, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Nangla Pohpi (Amwla Sultanpur, Bangar) P.s. Refinery, Distt. Mathura (U.p) ----Petitioner Versus The Collector District Magistrate, Jaipur, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Surbhi Khandelwal Mr. Tilak Jangir Ms. Jagrati Rathore for Mr. D.D. Khandelwal For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 18/02/2025
1. Petitioner has preferred instant civil writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, raising a grievance that the award dated 31.05.2022 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mathura, against the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation to the tune of Rs.50,04,400/- is not being implemented by the concerned District Magistrate and hence the instant writ petition has been filed against the District Magistrate, Jaipur.
2. Petitioner has not impleaded the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation as party-respondent in the instant writ petition against whom the impugned award is passed and which is being sought to be executed. RSRTC is one of the necessary party
[2025:RJ-JP:7080] (2 of 2) [CW-2561/2025] and due to non-impleadment the writ petition cannot survive and same is hereby dismissed.
3. Any other pending application(s) if any, stands disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J SOURAV /42