ARVIND KUMAR YADAV @ SHANI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
CRMP/378/2025 · 2025-01-31
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6892 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6892 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:5706
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 378 of 2025 Arvind Kumar Yadav @ Shani S/o Prakash Yadav Aged About 20 Years Caste Ahir, R/o Village- Ajgara, Police Station Golhowra, District- Shidarthanagar (U.P.)
... Petitioner(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Tapkara, District - Jashpur Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Verma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
Order on Board 31.01.2025
1. This is an office reference.
2. This Court, vide order dated 26.07.2024 passed in MCRC No.4016 of 2024, while rejecting the bail to the petitioner, namely, Arvind Kumar Yadav had expressed its trust that the trial Court would make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2025.01.31 16:32:35 +0530
2 accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of passing of the order, if there was no legal impediment.
3. The learned Special Judge (N.D.P.S. Act), Jashpur, District Jashpur (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 23.01.2025 has requested for grant of some more time for concluding the trial stating that statements of only Investigating OfÏcer and Goods Clerks is pending in the case and bailable warrant of Investigating OfÏcer namely Shri Dinesh Pandey has been received back on 23.01.2025 with the the note that ASI Dinesh Pandey is undergoing treatment in Mumbai as both his kidneys are said to be damaged. In such a situation, he prays for some more time to conclude the trial.
4. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, within a period of three months from today.
5. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction.
6. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha)
Chief Justice Manpreet