Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68917 (PNJ)

SATINDER PAL v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/31954/2025 · 2025-07-15

Anoop Chitkara

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

231 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31954-2025 Date of decision: 15.07.2025 SATINDER PAL ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Sarju Puri, Advocate for the peoner. Ms. Pooja Nayar Sharma, DAG, Punjab. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) Petition for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS FIR No. Dated Police Staon Secons 37 11.03.2025 Division No.6, Jalandhar, District Jalandhar 316(2)/318(4)/351(2) of BNS, 2023 1. The peoner apprehending arrest in the FIR caponed above has come up before this Court under Secon 482 of Bharaya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking ancipatory bail. 2. Counsel for the peoner submits that the peoner has been arrested. Consequently, the present peon has been rendered infructuous. 3. Given above, present peon stands disposed of as having become infrucutous. Pending applicaon(s), if any, stand disposed of. 15.07.2025 (ANOOP CHITKARA) renubala JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Renu Bala 2025.07.17 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document