Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6891 (UTT)

KANTA PRASAD GANGWAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/1396/2019 · 2025-09-04

Pankaj Purohit

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.1396 of 2019 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. S.K. Mandal, learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff. 2. Mr. S.K. Nainwal, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 3. Mr. Lalit Sharma, learned counsel for respondent no.3/defendant. 4. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner/plaintiff challenging the judgment and order dated 13.02.2017 passed by Civil Judge (J.D.) Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar in Original Suit No.49 of 2016, Kanta Prasad Gangwar vs. State of Uttarakhand & others as well as the judgment and order dated 06.03.2019 passed by 3rd Additional District Judge, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar in Misc. Civil Appeal No.04 of 2017, whereby the application moved by the petitioner/plaintiff for temporary injunction has been rejected and the appeal there-against was also dismissed. 5. Learned counsel for respondent no. 3/defendant has handed over to this Court a certified copy of the order dated 16.05.2023, which is taken on record. In the said order, it is stated that the application moved by the petitioner/plaintiff under Order 23 Rule 1(3) CPC for withdrawal of the suit has been allowed. 6. In view of the subsequent development, nothing survives in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the 2 writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 7. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 04.09.2025 AK