IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 274 CWP-1726-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.05.2026 SH SHYAM MANDIR SEWA SAMITI REGD CHULKANA DHAM ...Petitioner Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Mayank Aggarwal, Advocate and Mr. Ritvik Garg, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, A.G. Haryana with Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Addl. A.G. Haryana, Ms. Savneel Jaswal, Add. A.G. Haryana, Mr. Deepak Vashisht, DAG Haryana Mr. Akshit Pathania, AAG Haryana Mr. Sunil Chadha, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Tara Dutt, Advocate and Mr. Raghav Chadha, Advocate for respondent No.9 Mr. Rahul Jaswal, Advocate for respondent No.10 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of communication dated 13.01.2025 whereby respondent has expressed its intention to constitute a Shrine Board to manage Prachin Sh. Shyam Mandir, Samalkha, District Panipat. DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.05.14 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-1726-2025 -2- 2. Learned Advocate General, Haryana submits that matter has been amicably settled. A Shrine board to manage affairs of aforesaid temple is going to be constituted. There would be one representative of the petitioner in the Shrine Board. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner as well as private respondents agree to the aforesaid arrangement. 4. In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of. The Court is sanguine that respondent would constitute shrine board at the earliest. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE May 14, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.05.14 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment