Dhyan Foundation Gaushala v. Ratan Mahajan and ors
Crl.Petn./14/2025 · 2025-05-28
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 689 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 689 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA _A_G_A_R_T_A_L_A_
CRL PETN No.14 of 2025
Dhyan Foundation Gaushala ...... Petitioner(s)
V E R S U S
Ratan Majumder and others
..…. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raju Gupta, Advocate,
Ms. Nidhi Mishra, Advocate,
Ms. Shivani Dugam, Advocate,
Mr. Anupam Baidya, Advocate.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Raju Datta, Public Prosecutor.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. APARESH KUMAR SINGH =O=R=D=E=R= 28/05/2025
Mr. Raju Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant criminal petition has been filed to challenge the interim order dated 02.04.2025 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, South Tripura, Belonia in Crl. (Revision) 01 of 2025. The revision petition has already been
disposed of. Therefore, the instant criminal petition has become infructuous.
Mr. Raju Datta, learned Public Prosecutor also submits that since the main revision petition has been disposed of by the learned Sessions Judge, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant criminal petition.
In that view of the matter, the instant criminal petition is
disposed of as infructuous.
(APARESH KUMAR SINGH) CJ DIPESH DEB Digitally signed by DIPESH DEB Date: 2025.05.29 18:22:27 +05'30'