Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6889 (UTT)

ARVIND WILSON v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

CRLR/237/2020 · 2025-07-31

Subhash Upadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:6749 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CRLR/237/2020 Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. Mr. Bhuvnesh Joshi, Advocate for the revisionist. 2. Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, AGA for the State. 3. Mr. Shashikant Shandilya, Advocate for the respondent no.2. 4. Present Criminal Revision was preferred against the judgment and order dated 30.01.2020, passed by the Family Judge, Hairdwar, in Misc. Application No. 270 of 2019, Smt. Aster Wilson & others vs. Arvind Wilson. 5. Learned counsel for the parties submits that both the parties have amicably settled their disputes and they are residing together. 6. In such view of the matter, the Criminal Revision has become infructuous and the same is dismissed as infructuos. (Subhash Upadhyay, J.) 31.07.2025 Kaushal 2025:UHC:6749