Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6888 (PNJ)

DAVINDER SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/14291/2026 · 2026-05-15

Mandeep Pannu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

243 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DAVINDER SINGH AND OTHERS STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MS. Present: Mr.A.K. Mr. Navraj Singh Mahal, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Manbir Singh Batth, Advocate and Mr. Ritish Watts, Advocate for the complainant. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) The present petition to issue a direction to the trial Court to comply with the order dated 29.11.2025 Short repl have been filed today in Court, which are taken on record. However, a perusal of the file reveals that an application was moved by the petitioners before the trial Court for compliance of the afores order dated 29.11.2025 and vide order dated 09.02.2026, the said application has already been disposed of. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner request to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the learned trial Court. Dismissed as withdrawn with 15.05.2026 himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DAVINDER SINGH AND OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU A.K. Kalsy, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Navraj Singh Mahal, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Manbir Singh Batth, Advocate and Mr. Ritish Watts, Advocate for the complainant. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) The present petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, with a prayer to issue a direction to the trial Court to comply with the order dated 29.11.2025 Short replies on behalf of the respondent No.1 and the complainant have been filed today in Court, which are taken on record. However, a perusal of the file reveals that an application was moved by the petitioners before the trial Court for compliance of the afores order dated 29.11.2025 and vide order dated 09.02.2026, the said application has already been disposed of. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner request to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the learned trial Court. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. ( Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CRM-M-14291-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 15.05.2026 .....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU for the petitioners. Mr. Navraj Singh Mahal, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Manbir Singh Batth, Advocate and Mr. Ritish Watts, Advocate for the complainant. filed under Section 528 of BNSS, with a prayer to issue a direction to the trial Court to comply with the order dated 29.11.2025. on behalf of the respondent No.1 and the complainant have been filed today in Court, which are taken on record. However, a perusal of the file reveals that an application was moved by the petitioners before the trial Court for compliance of the aforesaid order dated 29.11.2025 and vide order dated 09.02.2026, the said application has At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner request to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the learned trial Court. aforesaid liberty. (MANDEEP PANNU) JUDGE (O&M) filed under Section 528 of BNSS, with a prayer on behalf of the respondent No.1 and the complainant However, a perusal of the file reveals that an application was aid order dated 29.11.2025 and vide order dated 09.02.2026, the said application has At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner request to withdraw HIMANSHU 2026.05.16 11:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document