IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (107) CRWP-6176-2025 Decided on :08.07.2025 SHARANJIT KAUR AND ANOTHER ……Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS ……Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present:- Mr. Harvinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. **** SUMEET GOEL, JUDGE (Oral) 1. The petition in hand has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following substantive prayer(s):- “It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that the present petition may kindly be allowed and directions may kindly be issued to respondents No.2 & 3, for not harassing/implicating the petitioners especially petitioner No.2 in any false criminal case at the instance of respondents Ns.4 to 6 on account of love affair of petitioner No.2 with petitioner No.1 as they are living in live-in relationship. It is further prayed that respondents No.2 & 3 be directed to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners so that no harm is caused to them by respondents No.4 to 6. Further issuance direction to official No.2 and 3 to decide or consider the representation dated 05.06.2025 (Annexure P-3) submitted by the petitioners, in time bound manner and appropriate manner, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing for sometime has limited his prayer by stating that he would be satisfied, for the nonce, if a direction is issued to respondent No.2 (Senior Superintendent of Police, NAVEEN NAGPAL 2025.07.08 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh CRWP-6176-2025 P a g e | 2 Gurdaspur) to consider and take a conscious decision on the representation dated 05.06.2025 made by the petitioner (copy whereof has been annexed as Annexure P-3 with the petition in hand) in a time-bound manner. 3. Notice of motion. 4. On the strength of advance copy, Mr. Jatinder Pal Singh, Sr. DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. Daljeet Singh Randhawa, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.6. He has urged that he has no objection in case limited prayer made by the petitioners, for decision of their representation dated 05.06.2025 (Annexure P-3), is directed for. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the rival party(s) and upon perusal of the paper-book, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the petition in hand with the following directions: (i) Respondent No.2 (Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur) is mandated to look into the representation dated 07.03.2025 (Annexure P-3) moved by the petitioners, objectively consider the grievance(s) raised therein & take ratiocinated decision thereupon within a period of 15 days from today. Said decision be conveyed to the petitioners within 7 days thereafter. (ii) No order as to costs. (SUMEET GOEL) July 08, 2025 JUDGE Naveen Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No NAVEEN NAGPAL 2025.07.08 17:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment HIgh Court Chandigarh