NARENDER AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/29669/2025 · 2026-05-19
Sanjay Vashisth
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6887 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6887 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 CRM-M-29669-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 257
CRM-M-29669-2025
Decided on :19.05.2026 Narender and Another ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and Others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Jatin Khurana, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amish Sharma, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Ankit Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral)
1. Instant petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, seeking quashing of the below detailed First Information Report (FIR), and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of the compromise dated 17.05.2025 (P-2), effected between the parties. DETAILS OF CRIMINAL CASE:- FIR No. Date Section(s) Police Station 19 10.01.2018 323, 342, 406, 420, 506 IPC Gohana
City, District Sonipat PREETI 2026.05.21 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 CRM-M-29669-2025
2. Vide order dated 30.07.2025, the affected parties were directed to appear before the learned Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, for getting their respective statements recorded with regard to the compromise. 3. Report has since been received from learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gohana in pursuance to the directions of this Court wherein, the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report(s) compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will and the private respondents have also made statement to the effect that they would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioners is quashed. 4. The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in original, along with its report. The relevant part of the said report is reproduced herebelow: Sr. No. Description
1. Total number of persons found involved as accused in the dispute/FIR Two accused
2. Number of complainant/victim(s) One complainant and one victim
3. Whether all the accused and complainant / victims are party to compromise & signed the same Yes
4. In case, any affected person(accused or complainant) is left out or not arrayed as party in the quashing petition before High Court, detail whereas; Or No complainant/accused has been left out in the petition and all have been arrayed as party in the petition.
PREETI 2026.05.21 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
3 CRM-M-29669-2025 His/her statement is till to be recorded, in compliance to the direction of this Court, details of such person
5. Whether any accused has been declared as a proclaimed offender/person or any such proceedings against him/her have been initiated or pending adjudication No
6. Report of the Court whether compromise is genuine, voluntary, and without any coercion or undue influence Yes
7. Any other aspect relevant to the present case. There were total three accused persons out of them two accused persons namely Gulab and Narender are now facing the trial. 5. Learned State counsel too submits that there were total three accused persons out of them the present petitioners are now facing the trial and the private respondents are the only aggrieved persons in the FIR in question. 6. In view of the report of the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gohana and the principles laid down by Hon’ble the Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed. PREETI 2026.05.21 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
4 CRM-M-29669-2025
7. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. 8. Petition stands disposed of. (SANJAY VASHISTH) 19.05.2026 JUDGE Preeti S. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No PREETI 2026.05.21 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document