SSTP PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLP v. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
WP/17428/2022 · 2025-08-14
Anu Sivaraman
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68866 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68866 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31709 WP No. 17428 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN WRIT PETITION NO. 17428 OF 2022 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
SSTP PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLP HAVING OFFICE AT 4tH FLOOR, ALPHA BLOCK, SIGMA SOFT TECH PART, NO.7, WHITEFIELD MAIN ROAD, OPP VARTHUR LAKE, BENGALURU 5600 66 REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, MR. N.M, UTHAPPA …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AKSHAY SRINIVAS, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VAMSHI KRISHNA C.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE KARNATAKA STATE FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES NO.1 ANNASWAMY MUDALIAR ROAD, HARMIT COLONY, SIVANCHETTI GARDEN, BENGALURU 560042
2.
THE INSPECTOR POLICE WHITEFIELD POLICE STATION, BENGALURU 560066 Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31709 WP No. 17428 of 2022
3.
THE LIQUIDATOR OF M/S IDEB PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED MR. VELAYUDHAM JAYAVEL 10TH FLOOR, DELTA TOWER, SIGMA SOFT TECH PARK NO. 7 WHITEFIELD MAIN ROAD, BENGLAURU 560066 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SWETHA KRISHNAPPA, AGA FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI. TUSHAR TYAGI, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. POORNIMA HATTI., ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE R1 TO INITIATE ACTION AGAINST THE R3 BASED ON THE COMPLAINT BEARING NOE.BNG/SSTP/2021-22/83 DATED 12.04.2022 (ANNEXURE-F).
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute between the parties has been resolved and nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition.
2. The said submission is not opposed by learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31709 WP No. 17428 of 2022
3. In the above view of the matter, the instant writ petition is therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE NG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47