Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68851 (BOM)

SHAIKH SHADAB S/O ABDUL REHMAN v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MANTRALAYA MUMBAI

CP/235/2025 · 2025-12-08

Shri N B Suryawanshi, Vaishali Patil Jadhav

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

{1} 25-CP-235-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 235 OF 2025 IN WP/2829/2022 Shaikh Shadab S/o Abdul Rehman ….Petitioner VERSUS The Principal Secretary Aid & Rehabilitation Department The State of Maharashtra, Mantralaya, Mumbai-400 032, & Others …..Respondents ….. Mr. Muhammad Aseem Mohd Abdul Kaleem, Advocate for the Petitioner Mrs. V.P. Dama, AGP for State Mr. Parth Salunke, Advocate for respondent No. 5 ....... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 08th DECEMBER, 2025 ORDER : 1. Learned AGP has placed on record copy of letter dated 21.07.2025 addressed by Collector, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar to Divisional Commissioner, thereby forwarding the proposal for releasing the arrears of petitioner. On receipt of the same, Additional Commissioner (Revenue), Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar has forwarded it to the Relief and Rehabilitation Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai, raising demand of Rs. 2,37,90,000/-. 2. The Additional Chief Secretary, Relief and Rehabilitation Bhagyawant Punde 2025:BHC-AUG:34713-DB {2} 25-CP-235-2025 Department shall take decision on the said proposal within four weeks from today. The petitioner shall be paid the arrears within eight weeks from today. 3. With these directions, contempt petition is disposed of. 4. It is made clear that, if time stipulation is not followed, the same will be treated as aggravated form of contempt. (VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) Bhagyawant Punde