[2025:RJ-JP:8119] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2222/2025 Kuldeep S/o Raju Lal, R/o Amartiya, Police Thana Hindoli Distt. Bundi (Rajasthan) (At Present Petitioner Confined In Distt. Jail Bundi) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Bajaj, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 24/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.36/2025 registered at Police Station Hindoli, District Bundi for the offences punishable under Section 303(2) of BNS, 2023, Sections 4/21 of MMDR Act and Section 177 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988. Investigation is being conducted in this matter for the offences punishable under Section 303(2) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 4/21 of MMDR Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate for which maximum punishment is three years. He argues that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner of similar nature and trial of the case will take [2025:RJ-JP:8119] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2222/2025] considerable time in its conclusion. He contends that the petitioner is in custody since 28.01.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as also looking to the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; absence of criminal antecedents of similar nature and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Kuldeep S/o Raju Lal shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/226