THE CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. GANESH BHALCHANDRA BHAVAR AND OTHERS
CA/14012/2025 · 2025-12-19
Shri Sanjay A Deshmukh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68837 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68837 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 938-939 ca.14010.25 anr.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
938 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14010 OF 2025 IN FA/599/2025 THE CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD VERSUS GANESH BHALCHANDRA BHAVAR ... Advocate for Appellant / Applicant : Mr. Abhijit Choudhari. Advocate for Respondent / Claimant : Mr. Shrikant Patil. … AND 939 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14012 OF 2025 IN FA/598/2025 THE CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD VERSUS GANESH BHALCHANDRA BHAVAR AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Appellant / Applicant : Mr. Abhijit Choudhari. Advocate for Respondents / Claimants : Mr. Shrikant Patil. ...
CORAM :
SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 19th December, 2025. P.C.: 1 Perused both the applications. 2 Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the claimants. They submitted that the appeals are
disposed of in the National Lok-Adalat. They pointed out that the amount under the impugned judgment and award is deposited in the Court, however, it is deposited in the connected matter due to resembles in the name of the claimant/s. 2025:BHC-AUG:36402
2 938-939 ca.14010.25 anr.odt 3 Both the learned Advocates submitted that the Registry may be
directed to make suitable corrections in their record as per MACP record and the Registry may be further directed to permit withdrawal/transfer as per corrected record and also the office of MACT, Dhule may be directed to permit withdrawal in favour of original claimants as per directions given by the Tribunal in the impugned
order. 4 For the reasons stated in the applications and considering the
submissions of the learned Advocates for the appellant and the claimants, the applications deserve to be allowed in the interest of justice. Hence, both the civil applications are allowed in terms of prayer clauses (B) to (D).
[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] nga