Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6883 (RAJ)

PARASRAM MEWARA S/O MATHARA LAL MEWARA v. VARDHMAN AGENCY SWAMI

CFA/291/2024 · 2025-08-11

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:30915] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 291/2024 Parasram Mewara S/o Mathara Lal Mewara, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Manohar Bawari Ke Pass, Bundi District Bundi (Rajasthan) ----Appellant Versus Vardhman Agency Swami, Smt. Suchita Chhajed W/o Abhishek Chhajeda, Resident Of Makan No. 1G-2, Vikas Nagar, Bundi District Bundi (Rajasthan) ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Ms. Rani Bhandari and Mr. Deepak Kumar Meena for Mr. Ashok Kumar Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 11/08/2025 1. This matter has come up on application No.1/2025 for extension of time for deposit of amount in pursuant to order dated 20.03.2024. 2. Learned counsel for appellant submits that pursuant to conciliation on last occasion, the appellant has paid the principal amount ₹90,000/- by way of demand draft to the respondent- plaintiff and respondent-plaintiff has agreed to settle dispute on receipt of ₹90,000/-. 3. Learned counsel for respondent-plaintiff acknowledged that respondent-plaintiff has received principal amount ₹90,000/- and he has waived and abandoned the interest amount along with expenses, as the matter is settled on payment of ₹90,000/-. [2025:RJ-JP:30915] (2 of 2) [CFA-291/2024] 4. In view of submission of learned counsel for the parties, the judgment and decree dated 02.12.2023 is satisfied after payment of demand draft of ₹90,000/- to respondent-plaintiff by appellant- defendant. No dispute remains pending between the parties. No order as to cost. 5. With aforesaid, the CFA stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /10