NARAIN SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/31948/2025 · 2025-07-08
N S Shekhawat
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68829 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68829 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
127 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31948-2025 Date of Decision:08.07.2025 Narain Singh and Anr. …Petitioners vs. State of Punjab and others
…Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present: Mr. Prince Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl.A.G., Punjab. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral)
1. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to issue directions to respondents No.1 to 4 to arrest all the accused and to complete the investigation in a time bound manner in a case arising out of FIR No.09, dated 04.02.2025, under Sections 109,190,191 of B.N.S, Police Station Chohla Sahib, Tehsil Patti, District Tarn Taran.
2. On advance notice, Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl.A.G., Punjab has appeared on behalf of official respondents and on instructions from SI Jassa Singh Police Station Chohla Sahib, Tehsil Patti, District Tarn Taran submits that in the present case three accused namely Manpreet Singh, Armandeep Singh and Akash deep Singh have been found to be involved in the crime. Out of three accused one accused namely Akashdeep Singh had applied for grant of anticipatory bail and has been granted the benefit of interim anticipatory bail by this Court. Learned State counsel further submits that the police has moved an HITESH 2025.07.08 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh
CRM-M-31948-2025 -2 application for issuance of warrants against the remaining two accused namely Manpreet Singh and Armandeep Singh (respondents No.5 and 6). He further assured the Court that the investigation shall be conducted fairly and impartially and if any person found involved in the case, he shall not be spared by the police.
3. In view of the assurance made by the learned State counsel, no further directions are required and the petition is accordingly, disposed of.
4. It is expected that the police shall conduct the investigation strictly, in accordance with law.
(N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 08.07.2025
JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2025.07.08 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh