RAM AUTAR (ADHOC PRINCIPAL) v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/8572/2025 · 2025-07-09
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68820 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68820 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110422 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8572 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Autar (Adhoc Principal) Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Saeed Siddiqui,Wahaj Ahmad Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following reliefs:-
" (A) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to make transfer in pursuance of list uploaded on the portal against the post of petitioner. (B) Issue a writ or direction or order in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondents to decide the representation of petitioner dated 12.6.2025 (Annexure-8), within time specified by this Hon'ble Court.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that his representation dated 12.6.2025 may be directed to be decided in time bound manner.
3. Sri I.P. Srivastava, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri I.P. Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel and perused the contents made in the writ petition.
5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made by learned standing counsel. The petitioner is directed to file a fresh detailed representation
along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no. 2, Director of Education (Secondary), UP Prayagraj within 10 days. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no.2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation.
6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 S.K.S. (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad