NANDAN SINGH JEENA v. CANARA BANK HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE BENGALURU
WPMS/1486/2025 · 2025-05-22
Ravindra Maithani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6882 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6882 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D- 22
WPMS No. 1486 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Mr. Chandra Prakash, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate for the respondents. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid.
(Ravindra Maithani J.)
22.05.2025 Avneet/