Saraswathy v. The State rep.by its, The Secretary to Government of Tamilnadu,
WP Crl./1792/2025 · 2026-06-17
Anita Sumanth, Sunder Mohan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6882 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6882 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP Crl. No. 1792 of 2025 __________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN WP Crl. No. 1792 of 2025 Saraswathy W/o.Ramalingam, 122-C, Middle Street, Mutlur, C.Mutlur, Cuddalore-608 102. ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The State rep.by its, The Secretary to Government of Tamilnadu, Home (Prison-IV) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Chennai Range, Chennai Egmore, Chennai-600 008. 3. The Superintendent, Puzhal Women’s Prison, Puzhal-600 066. ..Respondent(s) PETITION filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the vide Impugned order No.829/thaku, 1/2025, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 1792 of 2025 __________ dated 16.10.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent and quash the same and consecutively direct the 3rd respondent to grant ordinary leave for 40 days without escort to the detenu, Vanitha, D/o.Ramalingam, aged about 36 years, PID NO.20156, detained at Womens Prison, Puzhal. For Petitioner(s): Ms.K.Akshya for M/s.S.Manoharan For Respondent(s): Mr. C.R. Malarvannan Counsel for Government Of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) ORDER (Order of the Court was made by Sunder Mohan J.) The mother of the convict, viz., Vanitha, aged 36 years, has filed this writ petition challenging the impugned order dated 16.10.2025 by which the petitioner’s request for ordinary leave for the convict has been rejected on the ground that the convict has not completed one year since she had returned from the earlier leave on 04.06.2025. 2. We do not find any infirmity in the impugned order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 1792 of 2025 __________
3. The impugned order was passed on 16.10.2025. It is seen that as on date, one year has elapsed from the convict’s return to jail after her earlier leave. Therefore, the respondents are directed to consider the petitioner’s request in the light of the above changed circumstances and pass appropriate orders within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. The writ petition is closed with the above directions. (A.S.M.,J.) (S.M.,J.) 17-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ars https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Crl. No. 1792 of 2025 __________ DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J. AND SUNDER MOHAN, J. ars To
1.
The Secretary to Government of Tamilnadu, Home (Prison-IV) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Chennai Range, Chennai Egmore, Chennai-600 008. 3. The Superintendent, Puzhal Women’s Prison, Puzhal-600 066. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. WP Crl. No. 1792 of 2025 17-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis