- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30670 WP No. 6190 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 6190 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. MR. R. NAGARAJ S/O LATE M.P.RAMACHANDRA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.792, ARVIND NAGAR OIL MILL ROAD, ST. THOMAS TOWN POST BANGALORE-560 084. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANOHAR N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER BBMP, N.R.SQUARE BANNGALORE-01. 2. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (TOWN PLANNING) EAST DIVISION BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE 22ND FLOOR, SUBHASHCHANDRA BOSE ROAD BENGALURU-01. 3. MR. P. JAYARAMA REDDY S/O LATE G.P.PAPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/AT "SRI. LAKSHMI VENKATESHWARA NILAYA" NO.19, 4TH CROSS, 2ND B' MAIN G.P.PAPPA REDDY GARDEN OMBR LAYOUT, CHIKKABANASWADI BANGALORE-43. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SINCHANA M.R., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI. P.N.NANJA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R3) Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30670 WP No. 6190 of 2025 THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH, THE ORDER DATED 01-02-2025 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT (THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER, BBMP) IN APPEAL NO.186/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER The respondent-Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) has initiated action against the petitioner on the ground that the building being constructed by him is in violation of the building bye-laws and the sanctioned plan. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition is filed with a prayer to set aside the order passed by BBMP and consequently, the appeal filed by the petitioner before respondent no.1, which also has been dismissed. However, in the course of the proceedings, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that there were certain deviations and unauthorized construction put up by him and that he intends to remove the said deviations and unauthorized construction. The matter stood adjourned based on the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30670 WP No. 6190 of 2025 2. Today when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that all the deviations and unauthorized constructions have been removed and the BBMP may be directed to inspect the property of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2-BBMP submits that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to BBMP to inspect the construction put up by the petitioner and take action against the petitioner, if required under law. 4. Recording her submissions, the writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to inspect the building constructed by the petitioner and approve the same if it is put up in accordance with law or initiate further action in accordance with law, if any deviations are found to be existing. In view of disposal of main petition, pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE PGG