IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No. 3539 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.07.2025 Mohd. Yamin …Petitioner Versus Haryana Shahri Vikas Pradhikaran and others …Respondents AND CR No. 3543 of 2025 (O&M) Rajesh …..Petitioner Versus Haryana Shahri Vikas Pradhikaran and others …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Rajesh Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner (in both petitions). **** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) 1. This order shall dispose of the afore-titled revision petitions, both preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the Court of Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Panipat to decide the applications preferred under Orders 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short ‘CPC’) in Civil Suit No. 1626 of 2024, titled Mohd. Yamin Vs. HSVP and others and Civil Suit No. 1620 of 2024, titled Rajesh Vs. HSVP and others. 2. At the outset, while referring to the interlocutory orders passed by the trial Court, learned counsel for the petitioner (s) submits that though the application(s) under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC were filed in both cases and reply to the said applications were also filed, the trial Court framed issues on the basis of the pleadings of the parties and did not decide REKHA SHARMA 2025.07.02 21:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh CR-3539- 2025 and CR-3543-2025 -2- the applications for the grant of injunction. He submits that a direction be issued to the trial Court to decide the said applications within a fixed time frame. 3. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner(s). 4. Concededly, alongwith the suits filed by the petitioner(s), applications under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC were filed. Still further, service in both cases was completed and written statements along with reply to the applications for stay were filed. Admittedly, the applications under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC have not been decided and the matters have been posted for evidence of the plaintiff. 5. Having considered the matter, the present revision petitions are disposed of with a direction to the Court concerned to decide the applications under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC expeditiously and preferably within two months from the next date fixed in the matters. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE July 01, 2025 Rekha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No REKHA SHARMA 2025.07.02 21:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh