Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6879 (ORI)

ARTATRANA MISHRA v. CERTIFICATE OFFICER CUM SUB COLLECTOR, BARGARH

WP(C)/11341/2025 · 2026-07-17

M S Sahoo

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.11341 of 2025 Artatrana Mishra …. Petitioner Mr. Dolagobinda Mohapatra, Advocate -versus- Certificate Officer-cum-Sub- Collector, Bargarh & others …. Opp. Parties CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER 17.07.2026 Hybrid Mode 04. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition discloses the following: “The subject matter out of which the present W.P.(C) arises was never before this Hon’ble Court in any form whatsoever as per Instruction of the petitioner.” 2. In paragraph-5 of the petition it has been mentioned that W.P. (C) No.1259 of 2011 filed earlier by the petitioner (who was stated to be a disabled person) challenging the stoppage of ‘Madhubabu Pension’ granted by the State in a scheme. It has been further stated that by interim order dated 04.05.2011 ‘the pension was restored’. It is further submitted though not stated in the petition, the writ petition was thereafter dismissed for default. The Diary CMAPL No.14245 of 2025 has been filed for restoration of the writ petition which is pending consideration by this Court. In the present writ petition the P.R. No.14 dated p. 2 27.02.2025 issued by the OPDR authority seeking recovery ₹21,600/- has been challenged. 3. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner on 12.05.2025 notices were issued to the opposite parties. Today the matter being listed for orders is mentioned by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Memo of date is filed which states thus: “That, during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner has deposited the entire amount in Certificate Case No.14/2024. That in view of the aforesaid deposit, the grievance raised in present writ petition no longer survive. Hence the petitioner want to withdraw aforesaid writ petition.” (sic) 4. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of. (Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge Gs