Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68781 (KAR)

SRI. R VASUDEVA v. SRI. N LAKSHMANA @ LAKSHMAIAH

CRP/128/2020 · 2025-11-19

V Srishananda

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47664 CRP No. 128 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 128 OF 2020 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. R VASUDEVA S/O SRI RAME GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, 2. SMT. PRATHIBA W/O SRI R. VASUDEVA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT NO.15, NEW D SOUZA LAYOUT, HOSAKEREHALLI ROAD, KEREKODI ROAD, NEAR PESIT COLLEGE, BSK III STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 085 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PRASHANTH CHANDRA S N., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. N LAKSHMANA @ LAKSHMAIAH S/O SRI NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT NO.211, 37TH A CROSS, 26TH MAIN, 9TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 069. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.K. VASANTH, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47664 CRP No. 128 of 2020 THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC 1908 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 31.10.2019 PASSED ON IA No.II IN O.S.No.1841/2017 ON THE FILE OF XVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE I.A.No.II FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(d) OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Parties present with their respective counsel. 2. A sum of Rs.2,50,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Fifty Thousand Only) is paid by the petitioners to the respondent as full and final settlement. 3. Parties have presented a compromise petition signed by them and their respective counsel. The contents of the compromise petition are read over to the parties. They submit that the contents of the compromise petition depict true terms of settlement and there is no force, undue influence or coercion in reaching out the terms of compromise. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47664 CRP No. 128 of 2020 4. Accordingly there is no impediment for this Court to accept the compromise petition and dispose of the revision petition in terms of the compromise petition. Hence, following: ORDER (i) Revision Petition stands disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. (ii) In view of compromise, permissible court fee is ordered to be refunded to the plaintiff in the Court below. SD/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SBN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36