- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31205-DB WA No. 262 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT APPEAL NO. 262 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 159, RAMANAGAR 3. THE THASILDAR RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 159, RAMANAGAR …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. SHWETHA KRISHNAPPA, AGA) AND: 1. SRI UGRAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O HALAPPA, R/O BANNI KUPPE VILLAGE BIDADI HOBLI RAMANAGARAM TALUK AND DISTRICT-562 109 Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31205-DB WA No. 262 of 2023 2. SRI. CHIKKA THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, S/O THIMME GOWDA, R/O BANNI KUPPE VILLAGE BIDADI HOBLI RAMANAGARAM TALUK AND DISTRICT-562 109 3. SRI. RANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, S/O KEECHALU RANGAIAH, R/O BANNI KUPPE VILLAGE BIDADI HOBLI RAMANAGARAM TALUK AND DISTRICT-562 109 4. SRI. M. BHIMA RAO AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, S/O JOGI RAO, REP BY PA HOLDER SMT LEELAVATHI W/O LATE PRABHAKAR AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O BANNI KUPPE VILLAGE BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARAM TALUK AND DISTRICT-562 109 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VINAY D HOSMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R3 & R4 R2 - SERVED, UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO CONSIDER THE GROUND OF THE INSTANT APPEAL AND CONSEQUENTLY, SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 25/06/2021 IN WP NO.10488/2016. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31205-DB WA No. 262 of 2023 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) It is submitted by the learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the appellants that the Saguvali Chit has already been issued and the appeal does not survive for consideration. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents also submits that the Saguvali Chit had been issued in favour of the respondents. 3. In the above view of the matter, nothing survives for consideration in the appeal. The writ appeal is closed as having become infructuous recording that the Saguvali Chit has been issued. All pending Interlocutory Application[s] shall stand disposed of. SD/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE CR/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49