Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68767 (PNJ)

MANDIR THAKUR DWARA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/17228/2025 · 2025-07-04

Kuldeep Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (102) Mandir Thakur Dwara, Lalru State of Punjab CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. hereinafter extracted order, upon the instant petition : 2. him from the quarter concerned, informs this Court, that the representation (Annexure P authority concerned, within a period of o 3. for the State, instant writ petition, and the same is hereby 4. July 04, 2025 Manpreet IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Mandir Thakur Dwara, Lalru Versus Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Ankit Chowdhri, Advocate Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, AAG, Punjab. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) This Court, by drawing an order dated 01.07.2025, had passed the hereinafter extracted order, upon the instant petition : “At the outset, learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, seeks time to have instructions from the quarter concerned, and apprise this Court of the exact status of the representation filed by the petitioner as regards its grievance (Annexure P- required by the authorities concerned to decide the same.” Today, learned counsel for the State, on instructions imparted to him from the quarter concerned, informs this Court, that the representation (Annexure P-6), as filed by the petitioner, shall be decided by the competent authority concerned, within a period of one month from today. In view of the specific statement, as made by the learned counsel for the State, before this Court, no further order is required to be passed in the instant writ petition, and the same is hereby Consequently, the instant writ petition is 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17228-2025 Date of Decision : 04.07.2025 …Petitioner Versus ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, AAG, Punjab. This Court, by drawing an order dated 01.07.2025, had passed the hereinafter extracted order, upon the instant petition :- At the outset, learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, seeks time to have instructions from the quarter this Court of the exact status of the representation filed by the petitioner as regards its -6), and, as to how much time is required by the authorities concerned to decide the same.” , learned counsel for the State, on instructions imparted to him from the quarter concerned, informs this Court, that the representation 6), as filed by the petitioner, shall be decided by the competent ne month from today. In view of the specific statement, as made by the learned counsel no further order is required to be passed in the instant writ petition, and the same is hereby closed. tant writ petition is disposed of. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No : Yes/No This Court, by drawing an order dated 01.07.2025, had passed the At the outset, learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, seeks time to have instructions from the quarter this Court of the exact status of the representation filed by the petitioner as regards its 6), and, as to how much time is required by the authorities concerned to decide the same.” , learned counsel for the State, on instructions imparted to him from the quarter concerned, informs this Court, that the representation 6), as filed by the petitioner, shall be decided by the competent In view of the specific statement, as made by the learned counsel no further order is required to be passed in the MANPREET SINGH 2025.07.04 13:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment