Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6875 (JHR)

SHANKAR KUMAR SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/1477/2025 · 2025-06-23

Gautam Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:16485 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 1477 of 2025 ----- Shanker Kumar Shaw, S/o Late Amrit Shaw, R/o House No. 334, Telipara, Hirapur, P.O. & P.S.-Dhanbad, Dist.-Dhanbad, Jharkhand … …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad, P.O. & P.S.-Dhanbad, Dist.- Dhanbad, Jharkhand 3. The Chief Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Jharkhand, Office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand 4. The Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Dhanbad, P.O. & P.S.-Dhanbad, Dist.-Dhanbad, Jharkhand 5. The Additional Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Dhanbad, P.O. & P.S.-Dhanbad, Dist.-Dhanbad, Jharkhand … …. Respondents ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Prabhas Chandra Jha, Advocate For the State : AC to AG For the Intervenor : Mr. P.K. Mukhopadhyay, Advocate Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, Advocate For the Respondent No.4 : Mr. Mahabir Prasad Singh, Advocate Mr. Santosh Kr. Jha, Advocate ----- Oral Order 04 / Dated : 23.06.2025 I.A. No. 3178 of 2025 has been filed on behalf of intervener-Raja Saw on the ground that he is also interested and necessary party as the said order has been addressed to the petitioner as well as the intervener. In view of the fact that since the petitioner has alternative remedy, on his prayer, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to prefer the statutory appeal. The intervener will also at liberty to raise the issue before the Appellate Authority. Pending I.A., if any, stands disposed of. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) AKT/Satendra