- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35558 WP No. 16659 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 16659 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: P GOPALAKRISHNA BHAT SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS 1. SRI. VIVEK BHAT S/O LATE P. GOPALAKRISHNA BHAT AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT MAHALAKSHMI KRUPA NEAR MAHAMAYA TEMPLE, PUTTUR KASABA VILLAGE, PUTTUR TQ. D.K 574201. 2. SRI. VASUDEVA BHAT S/O LATE GOPALAKRISHNA BHAT AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS NEAR CAMPCO BUILDING, LAKSHMI GANESH, MAHAMAYA TEMPLE ROAD, PUTTUR KASABA VILLAGE AND POST, PUTTUR TALUK, D.K DIST. 574201 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SUYOG HERELE E.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI P MOHANDAS BHAT S/O LATE SHREEDHAR BHAT AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS R/AT MAHAMAYA KRIPA, COURT ROAD, PUTTUR KASABA VILLAGE AND POST, PUTTUR TALUK, D.K DISTRICT-574201 Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35558 WP No. 16659 of 2025 2. SMT. MAMATHA BHAT D/O P MOHANDAS BHAT AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 3. DR. THANVI SURENDRA PAI W/O P. SHRIDHARA PAI AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS RESPONDENT NO. 2 AND 3 ARE RESIDENTS OF MAHAMAYA KRIPA, COURT HILL ROAD, PUTTUR D.K 574201 4. SMT. VIDYA N NAYAK D/O LATE GOPALAKRISHNA BHAT AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT NO. 243, ANANTH, HORSESHOE LANE WATER FORD, HERTS, W.D.25 THE, U.K- SG14 …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO- SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 22.07.2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT PUTTUR. D.K IN OS NO. 272/2022 ON IA NO. VII AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE IA NO. VII AS PRAYED FOR ALLOWING THE PETITIONERS HEREIN TO ACCESS THE ARMS DEPOSIT ROOM (PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE -A). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35558 WP No. 16659 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petition calls in question an order dated 22.07.2024, by which, the application filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is rejected after hearing both the parties. 2. Therefore, the petitioner shall avail of the remedy as is available in law by filing an appeal and not the subject petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. Reserving such liberty, the petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 401