- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30913 WP No. 233 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.233 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. S NAGARATHNA W/O SRI MANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT NEAR VETERINARY HOSPITAL, OLD HOUSING BOARD COLONY, HASSAN - 573 201. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGARAJ D., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M S BUILDING DR. B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, HASSAN, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI H.K. KENCHEGOWDA, AGA FOR R.1; SRI AKSHAY P.V., ADVOCATE FOR SRI A. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R.2.) Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30913 WP No. 233 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 15.06.2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND 26.11.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND EFFECT THE KHATA IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF THE PETITION PROPERTY PURSUANT TO THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.02.2022 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND C.J.M., IN O.S. NO.98/2018 (ANNEXURE-A) PENDING DISPOSAL OF THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30913 WP No. 233 of 2025 ORAL ORDER 1. The case of the petitioner is that she is the owner of the property which is the subject matter of the writ petition. She made a request to respondent No.2 to change the Khata of the property in her name. As the same has not been considered so far, the present writ petition is filed with a prayer to direct respondent No.2 to consider the request of the petitioner in accordance with law and pass suitable orders. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.2, upon instructions, submits that the petitioner has not produced all the relevant records to show that she is the owner of the property concerned. He however submits that if all the relevant particulars are produced along with a fresh representation, the same will be considered in accordance with law and appropriate orders will be passed. 3. Hence, the following: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30913 WP No. 233 of 2025 ORDER Petitioner is given liberty to submit a fresh representation to respondent No.2 along with all the necessary particulars. Upon receipt of the same, respondent No.2 shall consider the same in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders within a period of eight weeks thereafter. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE hkh. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 94