- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31638 RSA No. 1880 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1880 OF 2021 (PAR-) BETWEEN: DODDU SHEDTHI AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, W/O LATE GOPALA SLHETTY, R/AT KADARABETTU HOUSE, HARIKHANDIGE POST, 41 SHIROOR VILLAGE 574128, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT …APPELLANT (BY SRI. S K ACHARYA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. RAGHUNATH SHETTY AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, S/O LATE GOPI SHEDTHI, AND LATE ANTHAYA SHETTY, R/AT KADARABETTU VILLAGE, HARIKHANDIGE POST, 42 SHIROOR VILLAGE 574128, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT PRESENTLY R/AT D NO 2-114A-27, 4TH CROSS, PUTTUR VILLAGE, SANTHEKATTE POST, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT 574128 2. SHOBHA SHEDTHI AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31638 RSA No. 1880 of 2021 3. ARVINDA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, 4. ARUN SHETTY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 5. SUMA SHEDTHI AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 6. SUREKHA SHEDTHI AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 7. BALAKRISHNA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, 8. PRAVEEN SHETTY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 9. AVINASH SHETTY AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 9 ARE CHILDREN OF LATE GOPALA SHETTY, R/AT KADARABETTU HOUSE, HARIKHANDIGE POST, 41 SHIROOR VILLAGE , UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT 574 128 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY., ADVOCATE) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.02.2021 PASSED IN RA NO.15/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT UDUPI IMPROPERLY CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.11.2017 PASSED IN O.S.NO.414/2015 ON THE FILE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31638 RSA No. 1880 of 2021 OF THE COURT OF THE III ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC UDUPI. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT None appears for the appellant. 2. Order sheet discloses that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal diligently. 3. When the matter was listed for referring matter to the mediation as the counsel for the appellant has earlier sought for settlement, neither the appellant nor counsel for the appellant was present before the Court. 4. Counsel for the respondent was present. As such the matter could not be referred to mediation. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31638 RSA No. 1880 of 2021 5. Appeal is pending since the year 2021. 6. Taking note of the same, appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. SD/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42