Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68696 (CAL)

MOUSUF ALAM v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/30067/2024 · 2025-11-10

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1011 2025 MONDAY Court : MB-24 Item : AD-59 Status : DAI ID : 266312 AR : NANDY IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 30067 OF 2024 MOUSUF ALAM VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. MR. SAMRAT SEN, LD. AAAG MR. NILOTPAL CHATTERJEE, ADVOCATE MR. SANTANU CHATTERJEE, ADVOCATE ……for the State 1. This is the third instance when the matter has been called. The petitioner like earlier instances, is unrepresented. 2. Mr. Chatterjee, learned Advocate representing the State produces two letters of 07.01.2025 and 04.11.2025, which are taken on record. 3. It appears from the letters that the tender which has been challenged in the instant writ-petition, has been given effect pursuant to the work order issued by the respondents. The tender has been completed, payments have been made and the matter is closed. 4. As such, the writ-petition has become infructuous and accordingly, WPA 30067 of 2024 is dismissed. 5. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 6. Urgent Photostat Certified Copy of this order be given to the parties, if applied for. (REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA, J.) P a g e | 2