CHIKKAPAPPAIAH @ PUTTABASAVAIAH v. SMT DODDATHAYAMMA
RFA/1418/2014 · 2025-10-23
D K Singh, Rajesh Rai K
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68682 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68682 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41739-DB RFA No. 1418 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1418 OF 2014 BETWEEN:
1.
CHIKKAPAPPAIAH @ PUTTABASAVAIAH S/O LATE KEMPALINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT DHANAGALLI, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK-570001.
SINCE DEAD BY LRs.,
1(a) SMT.BORAMMA W/O LATE CHIKKAPAPPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
1(b) SMT. SHEELA, D/O LATE CHIKKAPAPPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
1(c) SRI. PAVAN KUMAR, S/O LATE CHIKKAPAPPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/AT DHANAGALLI, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. ANIL KUMAR B.S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. AKARSH KUMAR GOWDA., ADVOCATE FOR A1(a TO c))
Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41739-DB RFA No. 1418 of 2014
AND:
1.
SMT DODDATHAYAMMA W/O LATE PUTTAIAH @ SAMBAIAH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
2. SRI.RAVIKUMAR S/O LATE PUTTAIAH @ SAMBAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
3. SRI.NAGARAJU S/O LATE PUTTAIAH @ SAMBAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
4. SRI.NINGAIAH S/O LATE KEMPALINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
5. SMT.SIDDAMMA W/O LATE PUTTAIAH @ SAMBAIAH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
6. SRI.P.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE PUTTAIAH @ SAMBAIAH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
7. SRI.P.NINGARAJU S/O LATE PUTTAIAH @ SAMBAIAH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
8. SMT.NINGAMMA D/O LATE PUTTAIAH @ SAMBAIAH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
9. SMT.SOWBHAGYA D/O LATE PUTTAIAH @ SAMBAIAH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
10. SMT.P.BASAVARAJAMMA D/O LATE PUTTAIAH @ SAMBAIAH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41739-DB RFA No. 1418 of 2014
11. SMT.P.NAGARATHNA D/O LATE PUTTAIAH @ SAMBAIAH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/AT DHANAGALLI, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK-570001. …RESPONDENTS (R-1, R-2, R-3, R-5, R-6, R-7, R-8, R-9, R-10, R-11- SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS RFA IS FIELD UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:10.06.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO. 8/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE IV-ADDL.
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MYSORE, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K)
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo for withdrawal of this appeal stating that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and filed a compromise petition under Section 23 Rule 3 of CPC in FDP No.78/2015 on the file of IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, Mysuru.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41739-DB RFA No. 1418 of 2014
Accordingly, a final decree was drawn in FDP No.78/2015. In that view of the matter, he seeks indulgence of this Court to withdraw the appeal.
Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, placing reliance on the memo.
Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1