Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68682 (KAR)

CHIKKAPAPPAIAH @ PUTTABASAVAIAH v. SMT DODDATHAYAMMA

RFA/1418/2014 · 2025-10-23

D K Singh, Rajesh Rai K

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41739-DB RFA No. 1418 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1418 OF 2014 BETWEEN: 1. CHIKKAPAPPAIAH @ PUTTABASAVAIAH S/O LATE KEMPALINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT DHANAGALLI, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK-570001. SINCE DEAD BY LRs., 1(a) SMT.BORAMMA W/O LATE CHIKKAPAPPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 1(b) SMT. SHEELA, D/O LATE CHIKKAPAPPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, 1(c) SRI. PAVAN KUMAR, S/O LATE CHIKKAPAPPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT DHANAGALLI, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. ANIL KUMAR B.S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. AKARSH KUMAR GOWDA., ADVOCATE FOR A1(a TO c)) Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41739-DB RFA No. 1418 of 2014 AND: 1. SMT DODDATHAYAMMA W/O LATE PUTTAIAH @ SAMBAIAH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, 2. SRI.RAVIKUMAR S/O LATE PUTTAIAH @ SAMBAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 3. SRI.NAGARAJU S/O LATE PUTTAIAH @ SAMBAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 4. SRI.NINGAIAH S/O LATE KEMPALINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, 5. SMT.SIDDAMMA W/O LATE PUTTAIAH @ SAMBAIAH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 6. SRI.P.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE PUTTAIAH @ SAMBAIAH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, 7. SRI.P.NINGARAJU S/O LATE PUTTAIAH @ SAMBAIAH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 8. SMT.NINGAMMA D/O LATE PUTTAIAH @ SAMBAIAH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, 9. SMT.SOWBHAGYA D/O LATE PUTTAIAH @ SAMBAIAH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 10. SMT.P.BASAVARAJAMMA D/O LATE PUTTAIAH @ SAMBAIAH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41739-DB RFA No. 1418 of 2014 11. SMT.P.NAGARATHNA D/O LATE PUTTAIAH @ SAMBAIAH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT DHANAGALLI, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK-570001. …RESPONDENTS (R-1, R-2, R-3, R-5, R-6, R-7, R-8, R-9, R-10, R-11- SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS RFA IS FIELD UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:10.06.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO. 8/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE IV-ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MYSORE, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K) Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo for withdrawal of this appeal stating that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and filed a compromise petition under Section 23 Rule 3 of CPC in FDP No.78/2015 on the file of IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, Mysuru. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41739-DB RFA No. 1418 of 2014 Accordingly, a final decree was drawn in FDP No.78/2015. In that view of the matter, he seeks indulgence of this Court to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, placing reliance on the memo. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1