Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6868 (RAJ)

VISHWAMBHAR LAL SON OF SHRI BOOJA RAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL

CW/14203/2018 · 2025-04-03

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:14979] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14203/2018 Vishambhar Lal son of Shri Booja Ram, aged about 61 years, R/o 298/5, Sector-3, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur (since deceased) through his Legal Representatives- 1/1. Smt. Maya Rani (Wife), Aged About 59 Years 1/2. Vijay Shree (Daughter), Aged About 38 Years 1/3. Jyotshna (Daughter), Aged About 36 Years 1/4. Vineet Kumar (Son), Aged About 31 Years 1/5. Vartika (Daughter), Aged About 28 Years All Resident Of 298/5, Sector-3, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Government of Rajasthan, State Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Irrigation, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The District Collector, Tonk 4. 5. The Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. Additional Collector (Rehabilitation) And Land Acquisition Officer, Bisalpur Project, Deoli, District Tonk Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshul Mathur Ms. Aafreen Rizvi for Mr. S. Zakawat Ali For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sweekriti Sharma for Mr. Archit Bohra, Addl. GC Mr. Abhishek Paliwal JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 03/04/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:14979] (2 of 2) [CW-14203/2018] 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents apprised this Court that relief sought for in this writ petition has been granted to the petitioner and the last pay slip in this regard dated 28.01.2025 has been produced on record in support of her contentions. 2. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, this writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Stay application as well as all applications (if any) also stand dismissed. 4. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to move application for revival of the writ petition, in case any grievance still survives. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/62