Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68675 (KAR)

SMT. GANGAMMA v. SRI. H. NARAYANAPPA

WP/18634/2023 · 2025-09-24

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38394 WP No. 18634 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 18634 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. GANGAMMA, W/O LATE BEERANNA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS. 2. SRI. ASHWATHAPPA, S/O LATE BEERANNA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS. 3. SRI. GANGADHARAPPA, W/O LATE BEERANNA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. 4. SMT. SAROJAMMA, D/O LATE BEERANNA, W/O RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. 5. SMT. GANGAMMA, D/O LATE BEERANNA, W/O VENKATESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 6. SMT. SUSHEELAMMA, D/O LATE BEERANNA, W/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38394 WP No. 18634 of 2023 7. SMT. GOWRAMMA, D/O LATE BEERANNA, W/O NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. 8. SRI. PRAKASH, S/O LATE BEERANNA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT CHEELANAHALLI VILLAGE, MANCHENAHALLI HOBLI, GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRINIVAS MANOHAR KULKARNI, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. H. NARAYANAPPA, S/O HANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, RESIDING AT: UPPARAHALLI VILLAGE, MANCHENAHALLI HOBLI, GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK. …RESPONDENT THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN M.A. NO. 10/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT GAURIBIDANUR PERUSE THE SAME AND ALLOW THIS W.P.; DIRECTION OF APPROPRIATE NATURE QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 09/08/2023 AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION (ANNEXURE-E) AND THEREBY ADVANCE THE CASE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38394 WP No. 18634 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "The Petitioners herein submit that the above Writ Petition has become infructuous and hence the same may kindly be dismissed accordingly, in the interest of justice." In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE CBC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10