Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010021902025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/291/2025 NURUL ISLAM AND 5 ORS. R/O VILL- 3 NO. TUPAMARI , PS NAGARBERA , DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM 2: EZAR ALI S/O MOJIBAR RAHMAN R/O VILL- 3 NO. TUPAMARI PS NAGARBERA DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM 3: TAHAJUDDIN S/O LT.ROSTAM MANDAL R/O VILL- 3 NO. TUPAMARI PS NAGARBERA DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM 4: AHER ALI S/OLT. NASIM ALI R/O VILL- 3 NO. TUPAMARI PS NAGARBERA DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM 5: BAHAR ALI S/OLT. NASIM ALI Page No.# 2/3 R/O VILL- 3 NO. TUPAMARI PS NAGARBERA DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM 6: HALIM UDDIN S/OLT. SOYOM ALI R/O VILL- 3 NO. TUPAMARI PS NAGARBERA DIST. KAMRUP ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP.BY THE PP,ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A PARAMANIK, P. KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER 05.05.2025 Heard Mr. A Paramanik, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. D. P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. Mr. Goswami has submitted that pursuant to the order dated 13.02.2025 passed in favour of the petitioners, they have already appeared before the Investigating Officer and have been cooperating in the investigation. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the both sides. Since the petitioners have appeared before the Investigation Officer and cooperating in the investigation, this court is of the opinion that the petitioners do not deserve to be detained in Page No.# 3/3 custody. Hence, their prayer for pre-arrest bail is allowed Accordingly, the interim order dated 13.02.2025 passed in favour of the petitioners by this court is made absolute. Case Diary shall be returned. The bail application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant