ANIL MUKHIYA v. STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER
CRWP/6036/2025 · 2025-06-05
Anil Kshetarpal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68656 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 68656 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
114 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6036-2025(O&M) Date of decision:05.06.2025
Anil Mukhiya ..Petitioner Versus State of UT, Chandigarh and another ..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Ms. Srishti S Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Rajiv Vij, Addl. P.P. for UT, Chandigarh ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel representing the petitioner admits that the petitioner’s request for the grant of extension of parole has been rejected and hence, she wants to avail remedy against the aforesaid
order. Ordered accordingly. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of.
(ANIL KSHETARPAL) 05.06.2025
JUDGE rekha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No REKHA SIHAG 2025.06.05 03:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh