Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 68655 (PNJ)

LOKESH KUMAR GODARA v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/32929/2025 · 2025-06-20

Sandeep Moudgil

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

126 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-32929-2025 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 20.06.2025 LOKESH KUMAR GODARA .......PETITIONER(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Ms. Riffi Birla, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(Oral) This petition has been filed under section 483 of BNSS read with section 528 of BNSS for seeking interim bail to the petitioner on account of medical grounds as petitioner is suffering from Hemorrhoidectomy (Piles) for more than last 3 years and is facing severe issues because of aforesaid medical problem in case FIR No. 159 dated 11.11.2019 registered Under section 302/307/323/212/34 IPC and 27/54/59 of Arms Act, 1959 registered at P.S. Khuian Sarwar, District Fazilka, in view of facts and circumstances mentioned in this petition. Learned State Counsel submits that the petitioner would be taken for check up for the ailment pointed out in the petition and necessary treatment would be provided, if so advised. Anuradha 2025.06.20 07:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-32929-2025 (O&M) 2 In view of the above submission made by counsel for the State, learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press this petition. Petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 20.06.2025 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Anuradha 2025.06.20 07:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document